The injustice of unilateral agreement


Conflicting agreements are sometimes inconsistent because they have terms that are obvious to the more negotiating party and leave the other party in a worse position than they would like. The unfair nature of conflict agreements has caused much controversy and criticism, with some arguing that they should be fully legalized. On the other hand, many feel that they still have a place in a context only if they achieve better results and transparency.



A contract is an agreement between two parties that sets the terms and constraints that ultimately make up a contract. When we say a contract is an agreement, we mean it.

It Is difficult for a person to sit down with all the parties and discuss the terms of each deal, but when a particular party has to make a deal with many parties. Therefore, each contract can be signed with as many parties as necessary. This not only wastes the contractor’s time, but also limits the number of people who can enter the contract.

Traditional contracts, often referred to as unilateral and unilateral contracts, are used to solve this problem. On the other hand, these contracts are immediately abused and most of the risk is shifted to the island.

Similar qualifications are found in construction contracts as between the developer and the buyer. Currently, unilateral agreements are problematic as they create conflict.


What is a unilateral contract?

A unilateral contract is a contract in which only one party agrees to abide by the terms of the contract and the other party respects the terms of the contract. These contracts differ from bilateral contracts in that only one party has to perform and no one can guarantee that the other will fulfill its obligations.

When both parties agree and accept all the terms and conditions of the contract, the contract is called a bilateral contract. A unilateral contract usually has two parties: the bidder (who gives the deal to the other) and the addressee (who accepts or rejects the offer on their behalf).

In the case of an invitation to repair, the law requires the supplier to comply with the terms of the contract if the other party trusts the supplier’s warranty. An example is a unilateral contract, such as a contract between a manufacturer and a buyer. This is the only “sales contract” that governs the relationship between the manufacturer and the customer.

It Is a legal contract that sets out the rights and responsibilities of both parties and carefully describes the details of the transaction. It is created at the time of sale and its content is determined according to the terms and conditions of the business management contract.


What is unfair trade?

Unfair business practices are often referred to as “unfair business practices” and often “fraudulent business practices”. Businesses may engage in unethical, unethical or unethical practices known as unethical business practices to get more customers or clients.

Unfair business practices include fraud, false advertising or product or service descriptions, packaging, false promises of gifts or rewards, fraud and failure to comply with manufacturing laws. Under the “Consumer Rights Protection Act”, such behavior is considered illegal business and consumers can choose to seek redress through compensation or heavy fines.


Conflicting contract issues

In today’s world it is common practice to use conflicting contracts to blackmail the other party into the agreement. However, there are also some disadvantages to consider.

These contracts are also called monotonous contracts because the buyer usually has to accept and comply with the contract while being protected by additional rights from third parties.

This is because the buyer is forced to accept and abide by the terms of the contract. Another problem with contracts that only benefit one party is that the other party has no power but to choose between two options: accept or reject the decision. If the contract contains terms that the bidder can object to, the bidder may have an unfair advantage.

Contracts may also be modified by misrepresentation in order to gain an unfair advantage. For example, a standard contract between a developer and a buyer might include a clause requiring the buyer to pay twenty percent interest in case of delay in payment.

In case of overtime work in the construction, only 2% interest penalty will be applied to the contractor.



Most people accept the terms of the contract and hope for the best. While blind faith sometimes works, the odds of it happening are one in a thousand. However, some simple adjustments can be made to make the contract more balanced.

By sending a request to a contractor to change the specific procedure. They use the same convention for everyone involved because they want things to be as simple as possible. However, the fact that some items in the drawings are for the benefit of only one party does not mean that the contractor will not modify these items to meet the needs of the other party. However, many people do not realize this because they believe that the contract is final and cannot be changed.

Understand that not all promises are legitimate. Some contracts contain provisions that cannot be enforced by law.

Finally, planning to stay away from doing wrong is one of your strongest defenses. If you can do this, you can sign the contract that you think is in your best interests.


Supreme Court opinion

If it is understood that the person who bought the flat has no choice but to sign the dotted line of the contract created by the contractor, the contract provisions will not be considered final and binding. It is a decision made in one of the important situations. In this case, the Supreme Court ruled that the prohibition on the sale of goods in the buyer’s contract constituted an unfair trade practice in violation of section 2(1)® of the Consumer Protection Act 1986.

These provisions are interpreted according to the law. The court, made up of judges Indu Malhotra and Uu Lalit, also said that developers are not allowed to try to bind honest buyers to negative terms. This decision was taken by the courts based on the judgment of the Supreme Court of India in Herald City Land and Others v Govindan Raghavan (2019)


By IREO Grace Realtech Pvt.

Against Abhishek Khanna and Ors. Recognizing that the Consumer Protection Act of 1986 authorizes the Consumer Forum to reject conflicting clauses in contracts where these terms constitute unfair practice. The decision amending the operation of the Law for the Law of 2019 will not be valid only for the lawsuits to be filed against the contractors. In addition, the inclusion of “unfair contract” clauses in the bill and the rejection of these provisions may cause traders and service providers to reevaluate their use of traditional “take it or leave it” contracts in their relations with consumers. This is because it prohibits “unfair” trade of content.



As stated in many decisions of the Supreme Court of Appeals, it wants to ensure that the parties who are in an unfair situation are treated fairly. While legislators pass various laws to address the situation on one side of the contracts, many people still have to sign contracts written by others to negotiate. Finally, it can be argued that one party should not compete with the other because the terms of the contract are only in their favour.


Contact best lawyer in Jaipur

Advocate Kunal Sharma

+91 7737501808
+91 7790905299

Office Address
Plot No. 114, Ganesh Nagar, Mansarover, Behind of Ganesh Pairadise Jaipur- 302020 (Raj.)


Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top